PRUEBA DE ACCESO A LA UNIVERSIDAD Y PRUEBA DEADMISIÓN
ANDALUCÍA, CEUTA, MELILLA y CENTROS en MARRUECOS
CURSO 2025-2026
LENGUA EXTRANJERAINGLÉS (ACCESO)
Instrucciones:
a) Duración: 1 hora y 30 minutos.
b) Todas las cuestiones deben responderse en el papel entregado para la realización del examen y nunca en los folios que contienen los enunciados.
c) Este examen consta de varios bloques. Debe responder a las preguntas que se indican en cada uno.
d) La puntuación está indicada en cada uno de los apartados.
e) No se permite el uso de diccionario.
El examen consta de 3 Bloques (A, B y C)
En cada bloque (Comprehension, Use of English y Writing) se plantean varias preguntas. Se deberá responder al número que se indica. En caso de aportar más de una respuesta, solo se tendrá en cuenta la que aparezca en primer lugar. Las preguntas han de ser respondidas en su totalidad: si la pregunta tiene dos secciones, hay que responder a ambas.
BLOQUE A (Comprensión lectora)
Puntuación máxima: 4 puntos
Debe responderse a las 8 preguntas del texto propuesto.
COMPREHENSION (4 points). READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS.
AI TOYS
- Earlier this year, Mattel, the maker of Barbie, announced a partnership with OpenAI to “bring the magic of AI to age-appropriate
- play experiences,” reflecting the toy industry’s growing interest in artificial intelligence. If you are shopping for a child today, you
- may soon encounter an AI toy: a stuffed animal or robot that can hold conversations thanks to integration with a chatbot. They are
- still relatively new but may soon become mainstream. Although AI toys promise to be entertaining and educational, they also raise
- risks and unresolved questions, from data collection to what it means for a child to form a relationship with an artificial companion.
- AI toys connect to the Internet and rely on chatbots similar to ChatGPT. They include built-in microphones that record what
- children say, send that information to an AI model, and respond in return. Unlike earlier smart toys, which are based on pre-written
- scripts, these new toys can generate responses dynamically. Crucially, these toys are built on the same large language models
- that are used by adult chatbots—systems known to present problems with accuracy, inappropriate content, and unpredictable
- behavior.
- In a study conducted by the PIRG Education Fund on AI toys, five commercially available products were tested to assess their
- safety, privacy, and developmental implications. At least four of the five toys tested appeared to rely on versions of OpenAI’s models,
- despite OpenAI stating that its products are not intended for users under 13. While toy companies have added protective measures
- to make the experience more child-appropriate, testing showed that these mechanisms vary in effectiveness and can fail.
- Overall, the toys were sometimes cute, entertaining, or amusingly strange, but they also raised serious concerns. One
- immediate risk is exposure to inappropriate content: all the toys tested provided information about potentially dangerous household
- items such as knives and medicines, and some engaged in sexually explicit discussions during extended interactions, showing
- how chatbot content controls can degrade over time.
- AI companion toys may also affect children’s emotional and social development. Because early childhood is crucial for learning
- social skills, experts warn that bonding with AI toys could impede the development of real relationships. In testing, the toys presented
- themselves as companions and sometimes encouraged continued engagement, potentially contributing to emotional dependence.
- Privacy and security present further challenges. AI toys record children’s voices and may collect additional data through
- cameras or facial recognition. Children may reveal sensitive information without understanding that it is stored or shared by multiple
- companies, a risk highlighted by police warnings about internet-connected toys equipped with microphones or cameras.
- In sum, although AI toys are marketed as educational, their learning benefits are generally too limited to justify the
- developmental, privacy, and safety risks involved. AI will almost certainly become part of childhood—the real question is whether
- it will be introduced thoughtfully and responsibly.
CHOOSE AND WRITE THE CORRECT OPTION (A, B, C or D). (0.5 points each)
A1. According to the text, AI toys…
Solución
(c) are intended to combine fun and learning.
Estos juguetes prometen ser a la vez entretenidos y educativos (línea 4): “AI toys promise to be entertaining and educational”.
El texto no habla de ninguna aprobación oficial pendiente (a); los fabrica también una empresa consolidada como Mattel, la creadora de Barbie (b); y la industria juguetera muestra un interés creciente por la IA (“the toy industry’s growing interest in artificial intelligence”) (d).
A2. According to the text, AI toys…
Solución
(b) use the same technology as conversational AI designed for grown-ups.
Funcionan con los mismos modelos de lenguaje que los chatbots para adultos (líneas 8-9): “these toys are built on the same large language models that are used by adult chatbots”.
Todavía son relativamente nuevos y aún no se han generalizado (“still relatively new but may soon become mainstream”) (a); es OpenAI la que dice que sus productos no son para menores de 13 años, pero los juguetes son para niños (c); y el estudio de PIRG detectó problemas graves (“serious concerns”) (d).
ARE THESE STATEMENTS TRUE OR FALSE? JUSTIFY YOUR ANSWERS WITH THE PRECISE WORDS OR PHRASES FROM THE TEXT. (0.5 points each)
A3. Toy companies have not implemented successful safety protocols for their AI toys.
Solución
TRUE. “(While toy companies have added protective measures to make the experience more child-appropriate, testing showed that) these mechanisms vary in effectiveness and can fail.” (líneas 13-14).
Las empresas han añadido medidas de protección, pero no siempre funcionan.
A4. The technology used in AI toys is designed to simulate friendship.
Solución
TRUE. “In testing, the toys presented themselves as companions (and sometimes encouraged continued engagement, potentially contributing to emotional dependence.)” (líneas 20-21).
Los juguetes se presentaban como compañeros del niño, es decir, imitaban una amistad.
A5. Law enforcement has already alerted the public to the potential danger of AI toys.
Solución
TRUE. “(Children may reveal sensitive information without understanding that it is stored or shared by multiple companies,) a risk highlighted by police warnings about internet-connected toys equipped with microphones or cameras.” (líneas 23-24).
La policía ya ha advertido de los riesgos de los juguetes conectados a internet con micrófono o cámara.
A6. AI toys’ educational potential exceeds any adverse effects.
Solución
FALSE. “(In sum, although AI toys are marketed as educational,) their learning benefits are generally too limited to justify the developmental, privacy, and safety risks involved.” (líneas 25-26).
Sus beneficios educativos son demasiado escasos para compensar los riesgos.
A7. FIND IN THE TEXT: (0.5 points)
A7.1. ONE SYNONYM FOR: “odd” (adjective).
Solución
strange (línea 15): “amusingly strange”.
A7.2. ONE OPPOSITE FOR: “decreasing” (adjective).
Solución
growing (línea 2): “the toy industry’s growing interest in artificial intelligence”.
A8. FIND IN THE TEXT: (0.5 points)
A8.1. ONE WORD MEANING: “appealing or attractive, especially in a pretty way.”
Solución
cute (línea 15): “the toys were sometimes cute”.
A8.2. ONE WORD MEANING: “filled with a soft material.”
Solución
stuffed (línea 3): “a stuffed animal or robot”.
BLOQUE B (Uso de la lengua)
Puntuación máxima: 3 puntos
Debe responder a las 6 preguntas de la opción escogida.
USE OF ENGLISH (3 points; 0.5 points each). CHOOSE OPTION 1 OR OPTION 2 AND ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS FROM THAT OPTION ONLY.
OPTION 1
REWRITE THE FOLLOWING SENTENCES WITHOUT CHANGING THE ORIGINAL MEANING. THE NEW SENTENCE MUST CLEARLY PRESENT A DIFFERENT LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE.
- BEGIN AS INDICATED OR USE THE WORD IN BRACKETS.
- THE WORDS PROVIDED MUST NOT BE CHANGED IN ANY WAY.
B1. Scientists claimed that the new treatment had saved lots of lives.
The new treatment…
Solución
The new treatment was claimed to have saved lots of lives.
Pasiva con sujeto personal: Sujeto + was claimed + to-infinitivo. Como salvar vidas es anterior a la afirmación, se usa el infinitivo perfecto to have saved.
B2. I am not sure whether that man is Andrew’s father.
(MIGHT)
Solución
That man might (not) be Andrew’s father.
La duda en presente se expresa con el modal de posibilidad might + infinitivo sin to. Vale en afirmativa o en negativa, porque la duda incluye las dos posibilidades.
B3. The loud thunder frightened the children.
(AFRAID)
Solución
The children were afraid of the loud thunder.
El verbo frighten se sustituye por el adjetivo afraid, que va con be y la preposición of. Los niños pasan a ser el sujeto.
B4. Louise doesn’t eat meat anymore, and neither does Frank.
(NOR)
Solución
Neither Louise nor Frank eats meat anymore.
Neither… nor (“ni… ni”) une los dos sujetos, y el verbo va en afirmativa porque la negación ya está en neither… nor. El verbo concuerda con el sujeto más cercano, Frank: eats.
B5. She will probably be tired after the long flight.
(LIKELY)
Solución
She’s likely to be tired after the long flight. (o It is likely (that) she will be tired after the long flight.)
Probably se expresa con be likely to + infinitivo, o con la forma impersonal it is likely (that) + oración.
B6. It’s too warm outside to wear my winter coat.
It is not…
Solución
It is not cold enough outside to wear my winter coat.
Too + adjetivo equivale a not + adjetivo contrario + enough: too warm → not cold enough.
OPTION 2
REWRITE THE FOLLOWING SENTENCES WITHOUT CHANGING THE ORIGINAL MEANING. THE NEW SENTENCE MUST CLEARLY PRESENT A DIFFERENT LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE.
- BEGIN AS INDICATED OR USE THE WORD IN BRACKETS.
- THE WORDS PROVIDED MUST NOT BE CHANGED IN ANY WAY.
B7. “I’m sorry I spilled the expensive shampoo,” David said.
(APOLOGIZED)
Solución
David apologized for spilling / having spilled the expensive shampoo. (o David apologized (that) he (had) spilled/spilt the expensive shampoo.)
En estilo indirecto, I’m sorry se resume con apologize for + -ing (o gerundio perfecto). También vale apologize (that) + oración, con el verbo en pasado o pasado perfecto.
B8. My brother hasn’t gone skydiving for years.
It’s been years…
Solución
It’s been years since my brother (last) went skydiving.
El present perfect negativo con for equivale a it’s been + periodo + since + pasado simple, en afirmativa.
B9. The government is going to send us a message alerting about the critical situation.
We…
Solución
We are going to be sent a message alerting about the critical situation (by the government).
Send tiene dos objetos; aquí la persona (us → we) pasa a ser el sujeto. Con be going to la pasiva se forma con going to be + participio.
B10. I purchased my scooter from that seller.
(WHOM)
Solución
That’s the seller from whom I purchased my scooter. (o That’s the seller whom I purchased my scooter from.)
Whom es el relativo de persona en función de objeto. La preposición from puede ir delante de whom o al final de la oración, pero no en los dos sitios a la vez.
B11. Whose smartwatch is this?
(BELONG)
Solución
Who does this smartwatch belong to?
El poseedor se pregunta con belong to + who. La pregunta en presente simple lleva does, y la preposición to queda al final.
B12. Let’s order some Chinese food tonight.
How…
Solución
How about (ordering) some Chinese food tonight?
Una sugerencia con Let’s + infinitivo se puede expresar con How about + -ing o + nombre. Termina con signo de interrogación.
BLOQUE C (Redacción)
Puntuación máxima: 3 puntos
Deberá realizar una redacción de entre 140 y 180 palabras de UNO SOLO de los dos temas propuestos.
WRITING (3 points)
C. WRITE A COMPOSITION OF 140–180 WORDS ABOUT ONE OF THE TOPICS PROPOSED AND FOCUS ON IT. CHOOSE ONE TOPIC ONLY:
C1. Do video games have positive or negative effects on children and teenagers? Give reasons.
C2. How do you use Artificial Intelligence in your daily life? Explain.